The various branches of the Honiton and Tiverton constituency party usually concentrate on national rather than local politics – probably because Labour has no representatives at District level. However, the glinting skull of Tory privatisation has been exposed beneath the skin of normal Council business – courtesy of a gang of active independent councillors and their terrier blog, East Devon Watch (see Links).
Various commentators have puzzled over the Chancellor’s pig-headed insistence on a catastrophic austerity programme in spite of wide-spread economist advice against it. It has been suggested that he is doing this to strip away the state (NHS, BBC, etc) in favour of privatisation by his friends and contributors. While this seems entirely in character, there is not much we can do about it here in the blue wastes of the Tory South West; but we can do something about the local plot.
The story comes from East Devon Watch at Devolution. Click on this link to see the text, but here is my summary:
(a) The government has offered to devolve power and budgets from central to local government, but the process must be “business-led” involving a Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP). In the SW, the LEP is called Heart of the South West (HoSW) and it is leading a devolution bid together with 17 local authorities. See link above for details.
(b) LEPs have no democratic structure or representation and do not publish minutes of meetings. There is a discussion of objections to devolution on the LEP network, together with a defence of the government’s strategy. It suggests the structure of the devolved organisations should be agreed locally, but only in secrecy because . . .”these are often difficult and uncertain conversations that benefit from a degree of privacy, to allow for more honest and frank conversations to take place. It would be much harder, if not impossible, to conduct these negotiations in public.” So much for democracy and local representation.
This is a sinister development with major implications for society on a local level. We need to apply whatever pressure and influence we can to get as much public control and influence over the process and our CLP can be as active here as any.
I am writing to the Chairs of our branch and CLP to suggest this be debated at the next meetings.